MANCHESTER, NH — “You have to ask the question, is capitalism really about the ability of a handful of rich people to manipulate the lives of thousands of people and then walk off with the money?”
Who said it — Elizabeth Warren? Dennis Kucinich? Noam Chomsky?
Not quite, that was Newt Gingrich talking to reporters at an energy company in Manchester on Monday about his new effort to paint Mitt Romney as a greedy one-percenter who finds “clever legal ways” to go about “looting a company” while screwing over its workers.
Gingrich’s argument against Romney over Bain’s history of downsizing has become increasingly similar to the Occupy Wall Street crowd’s criticism of the financial system, let alone national Democrats. Compare his latest attacks to, say, DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is spearheading the party’s current anti-Romney effort.
“Mitt Romney, I think, is more of a job cremator than a job creator,” Schultz told TPM recently. “He was a corporate buyout specialist at Bain Capital. He dismantled companies. He cut jobs. He forced companies into bankruptcy and he outsourced jobs and sent jobs overseas.”
The former Speaker is making the case that, in contrast to good old fashioned businesses who make stuff, Romney and his ilk have instead gamed the system to create a soulless machine that profits from the misery of others. Whereas Republicans used to merely whisper that Bain was an electability problem for Romney, Gingrich and other candidates are now openly making the case that the invisible hand has failed to stop corporate raiders from hurting American workers — even as they condemn President Obama as a radical socialist for his rhetoric on Wall Street.
“I am totally for capitalism, I am for free markets,” Gingrich assured reporters on Monday. “Nobody objects to Bill Gates being extraordinarily rich, they provide a service.” What he instead is concerned about is when an investor receives “six-to-one returns, and the company goes bankrupt.”
And that’s just the candidate himself. Previews of a new film produced by a pro-Newt Super PAC that will air in South Carolina are as brutal as they come about Romney’s brand of management.
“Capitalism made America great - free markets, innovation, hard work - the building blocks of the American Dream,” the narrator of the film intones. “But in the wrong hands some of those dreams can turn into nightmares.”
Gingrich defended his new negative tack to reporters on Monday, saying Super PAC spending by Romney supporters left him little choice but to go on the offensive. He insisted that his brutal new anti-Romney line wasn’t kneecapping his party’s general election chances.
“If somebody’s going to crumble, they better crumble before the nomination,” he said.
Rick Perry has been running hard against Wall Street in recent days as well. One Iowa ad said Romney “made millions buying companies and laying off workers” and Perry himself went after the frontrunner in South Carolina for talking about how he was once worried about receiving a “pink slip” himself.
“I have no doubt that Mitt Romney was worried about pink slips, whether he was going to have enough of them to hand out because his company Bain Capital with all the jobs that they killed, I’m sure he was worried that he’d run out of pink slips,” he said, per CNN.
Benjy Sarlin
Benjy Sarlin is a reporter for Talking Points Memo and co-writes the campaign blog, TPM2012. He previously reported for The Daily Beast/Newsweek as their Washington Correspondent and covered local politics for the New York Sun.
i never liked ron paul or anybody from the GOP. but after many heated debates with paul-bots and paul-ites, i must admit that i was wrong. and i hate to break it to my fellow progressive libs, but ron paul should not be lumped into the same category of the rest of these GOP clowns. if you're able to filter out the unelectable nutbag racist crazy uncle rhetoric that's being shoved down out throats everywhere you turn, it becomes pretty apparent that on core issues he is actually the most progressive candidate running for president. whatever happened to the anti-war camp that was once so prevalent in the democratic party? what happened to the anti-drug law liberals that used to be so active during the bush era?
now before you start mentioning his pro-life stances on abortion, or homophobic stance against gay marriage, or the absurdity of his desire to return to the gold standard, let me tell you, that i've done the research, and i hate to say it, but the paul-bots turned out to be actually correct in their defense against these accusations, because none of those claims actually carried any weight, i'm not trying to tell anyone what to think or how to vote, but i think as progressives it is up to us to not fall prey to group think and being herded as sheeple by our tv or internet. i am now seriously reconsidering my position on ron paul. he is the enemy of my enemy, so that makes him okay in my book.
brucerhee1127 I heard the same things and have done the research and have yet to come up with anything that shows me with certainty he is racist, or a bigot, or blah, blah, blah. His opponents are skilled at misdirection and will stop at nothing to spread their personal agenda.
If I didn't distrust Wall St. so much, I'd invest in popcorn. I'm eating so much of it right now, being entertained by these sharks turning on each other as they smell each others' blood in the water. This is what the Republican Party has become when it swings too far to the Right of the flat earthers; when it associates with candidates that even want to take away women's rights to contraceptives. You get a corporate raider on the one hand (Romney), a guy that wants to have kids on welfare put in orphanges (Newt), women lose access to all form of artificial birth control including the Pill, IUD, and morning after pill (Paul and Santorum), a guy that wants Texas to secede (Perry) and Huntsman...well, the best thing I can say about him is to quote the pundit who said that at least he's a mammal.
He's not suggesting we need to regulate corporations, is he? Say it ain't so. That's just so un-Raegan. In the free market, businesses are forced to do what their customers want, right? Otherwise competition will drive them out of business, right? And what about Ayn Rand? Screw the losers. Grab what you can get. That's the Republican way.
You got to hand it to newt. He makes gymnasts look inflexible.
More proof that the conservative side is not truly conservatives but merely greedy slime balls that will destroy anyone who stands in their way of gaining a profit....
It doesn't improve Newt's chances at all, though. If anything, it'll just take down Romney and hand it to Ron Paul. Newt is still unelectable, no matter how you slice it.
I am loving this...
So much ammunition for Obama...
Perhaps someone should have told Mitt about what Gingrich did to Speaker of the House Jim Wright.... No doubt, Wright had ethical problems, but Gingrich pointed klieg lights at them and then narrated them like the voice-over in a violent cartoon. He exaggerated Wright's problems on his way to becoming speaker. After Mitt mugged Newt in Iowa using the bankster methods, Mitt should have seen this coming. Mitt will learn now that payback is an MFer.
I just cant like this enough!
"a greedy one-percenter who finds “clever legal ways” to go about “looting a company” while screwing over its workers."
Thanks, Newt, couldn't have put it better myself.
Newt's given us another trump card to play, maybe the Dems need to get a whole roomfull of laid-off people for whom Bain was the bane of their existence. Then just video their conversations with each other and with interviewers, the resulting footage would be priceless.
And not just one lone victim, but a whole room full of them.
"What has BAIN done to you?"
So a Republican IS capable of speaking the truth in public - but only when he or she stands to gain something from it, I guess. Like the born-again Republican sudden conversion to fiscal conservatism circa last-election, these assclowns do know their facts - they just conveniently forget or remember them as they see fit. Romney's far from the only flopper there.
kunda311 you mean besides ron paul?
Scottie Scanlonkunda311 If by "truth" you mean "nutbag conspiracy nonsense and Victorian economic theories with a touch of eugenicism" then, yes.
These fools are going to make it much easier to make this argument against Romney in the general... Obama can point back to these statements made by Gingrich & Perry and say.... even the other Republicans agree with me.
It doesn't matter which GOP contender is in deeper trenches with Wall Street. Just as soon as the primary is wrapped up, whoever the Republican nominee will be, they will answer to the demands of Wall Street, the Banks, and the 1% even more..
Thanks you Citizens United.
Personally, I think this is a fascinating development. Could it be, that Romney, by being both the leading GOP candidate and a .1%er, actually legitimize the 'Occupy' arguments in the minds of many of the GOP faithful?
I don't believe it, this creep is stealing some of our best material!
Newt on Romney:
His bologna has a first name,
It's P-I-O-U-S,
His bologna has a second name,
It's horses A-S-S,
He loves to dish *^it every day,
Raid corporations for his pay,
And shuts the place down where you work,
'Cause he's another Wall Street jerk.
All we have to do is page back a few years and look at Newter's response to the slight given him by then President Clinton. By the time his hissy fit had run it's course he had managed to get his bloviated butt run out of DC by his own party. Call this Snot Shots, Part Deux.
Has Newt decided that since he will not get the nomination, Romney will not get to be president?
bison I think Newt's thinking is if he can't get to be president then NOBODY will.
Admittedly, he hasn't really thought it through, but y'know... Newt's a man of ACTION.
spas485bison
This can't be Newt's decision. Super PACs aren't supposed to coordinate with candidates I thought. Who can get the FEC to check into this? spas485 bison
casualreprobate If there's anything to check into - CREW.
JJRotherycasualreprobate
they are already going after Newt,
spas485bison This is more hostage-taking of the kind the Tea partiers in House have been practicing all of 2011. "Gives us what we demand or we'll destroy everything!"
And Newt is being funded by Ahramson the billionaire. These are definitely not the kinds of people who actually built America. These people are like Newt - mentally ill. Is Newt any different from Alan West or Louie Gohmert?
spas485bison Perhaps Newt only sees an opportunity to win if he wins the nomination, or if he faces a different Democratic nominee in 2016.
If Romney were to somehow lock it up in 2012, with current trends, Newt may have Reagan syndrome by the time he'd have another shot.
spas485bison
bison He wasn't going to get to be the President anyway. :)
“You have to ask the question, is capitalism ... money?” said Freddi Mac's resident historian.
Nice to see some facts in a Republican campaign for a change.
marc23 More like half-truths considering Gingrich is in the 1% as well.
Maybe Newt will get a second surge, now that he has an attack video AND the coveted endorsement of Todd Palin.
bearclaw I just sent a link to that... figured they could use it in a "Who Gives a Rat's Ass" section of TPM2012.
davidasrbearclaw Does this mean Ms Palin will not be running for the Preznitsy? Or is Todd just a little more crazy than we thought.
Commie Dearestbearclaw Yes.
Commie,
Maybe Newt promised Todd that in a Gingrich Presidency, Alaska will be given its independence. Then Todd and Sarah can reign as King and Queen of the Frozen North.
Commie Dearestdavidasrbearclaw SCHIZOPHRENIA LIBEL!!!!!!
anouthouseCommie Dearestbearclaw I've been thinking on this some in the past half hour or so (yes, I have no life) and I started wondering what Todd had to promise/give up to Caribou Barbie to make it Not About Her this time?
davidasranouthouseCommie Dearestbearclaw "Really, Sarah? ANOTHER kid?!"
I usually go to the source for all things Palin:
http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/davidasr anouthouse Commie Dearest bearclaw
stephen-maturin Oh DAMN... I wish you'd have warned me not to have a mouth full of dinner before I read that!
NEWSMAX attacks the TPM/JMM Seal of Approval Candidate
Monday, 09 Jan 2012 03:47 PM
By Paul Scicchitano
Read more on Newsmax.com: Voters Eat Up Gingrich’s ‘Pious Baloney’ Jab at Romney Important:
JohnMcCSF Flagged spam.
JohnMcCSF - Newsmax? What a joke
JohnMcCSF
R*n P**l is nuts. Just sayin'...
In principle, the Newt believes that "capitalism" really IS about the ability of a handful of rich people to manipulate the lives of thousands of people and then walk off with the money. But he has a campaign to run, and god damn it, he'll lie to take down Mitt Romney. Not that he'd govern differently, of course.
HarryBowman Mitt may get the nomination, but Newt is making sure that he will not become president.
Newt is dog crap, plain and simple. he has zero integrity as his history shows, and he lives in a bubble with people who stroke his ego all day. he is clueless to what a Real American is and frankly I think he might be insane. If he dies tomorrow I would dance in the street. Not the Romney is any better. More turds in the turd sack of what has become Corporatlized American Politics. it makes me sick!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like